An incident in which a vessel strikes port infrastructure with its bow, side, or stern is referred to in maritime doctrine as an allision. This is a situation in which a vessel (a moving vessel with momentum) collides with a completely stationary object, such as a quay, pier, dolphin, or navigational mark. A collision, on the other hand, is an incident involving the collision of at least two vessels, at least one of which is in motion. For shipowners, captains, shipping agents, and port authorities, such an incident marks the beginning of a complex legal and technical procedure. Questions arise regarding the preservation of evidence, financial liability, the risk of vessel detention, and the proper settlement of damages.
Work at a seaport is characterized by constant activity, high dynamism, and a high degree of risk. The daily maneuvers of multi-metric-ton vessels in the confined waters of harbor basins require surgical precision, excellent cooperation between the crew and pilots, and reliable equipment. Unfortunately, even when the highest safety standards are maintained, technical failures and human errors cannot be entirely avoided. One of the most stressful and costly incidents at a port is a ship striking the quay. In this article, using a simulated incident as an example, we will discuss the difference between a grounding and a collision, what the first few hours after an accident look like step by step, and how professional legal support from the LO:ME Law Firm can protect maritime industry participants from losses amounting to millions.
Allizja vs. Collision – Basic Concepts and Legal Differences
In everyday language, any collision involving a ship is often referred to as a “collision.” Under maritime law, however, it is necessary to distinguish between two concepts: allision and collision. This distinction is crucial for determining the applicable conventions, the liability regime, and the parties involved in the dispute.
In maritime law, an allision is a collision between a vessel and port infrastructure, such as a wharf. We use this term when a moving vessel strikes a stationary object. A collision, on the other hand, occurs when at least two vessels collide, and at least one of them is in motion.
In the event of a collision, the dispute is most often between two shipowners and their insurers. In the case of an allision, the other party to the dispute is the owner of the port infrastructure—most often the relevant port authority. These authorities have specific legal tools at their disposal (as discussed later in this article) that allow them to secure their claims very quickly.
Case Study: Power Loss and Collision with the Wharf
To better illustrate the procedures and challenges associated with allision, let’s analyze a real-world maritime situation. The incident involved a ship.
During the night, while performing a turning maneuver in the harbor basin, an extremely dangerous malfunction occurred on the ship—a complete propulsion blackout, that is, a sudden loss of power in the main engine. Despite the presence of a harbor pilot on board, the ship immediately lost steering control and, carried by its momentum, struck the concrete pier with its bow.
In a fraction of a second, a routine mooring maneuver turned into a maritime accident, posing enormous legal and financial risks to the shipowner and requiring an immediate response from the maritime authorities.
The First Few Minutes After an Incident—Responsibilities and Reports
When a collision occurs, the initial decisions are the most important. In the case in question, the harbor pilot on board the vessel immediately reported the incident to the Harbor Master’s Office, which is his absolute duty. The Harbor Master’s Office, as a maritime administrative authority, is responsible for the safety of navigation in the waters under its jurisdiction.
On the direct orders of the Harbor Master, the damaged vessel could not remain at the site of the collision. It was safely moored along the quay. This action was intended to secure both the vessel and the damaged infrastructure, as well as to restore port traffic for other ships. At this point, the relevant authorities and commissions step in. And for the captain and the shipowner, the race against time and the process of establishing the facts begins.
The Port Commission’s Work Following a Ship Collision
The Port Authority, which owns the damaged quay, immediately established a special commission to investigate the extent of the damage and estimate the cost of the necessary repairs. The commission consisted of representatives of the Port Authority and an officer from the Port Captain’s Office.
The Commission carried out a thorough investigation, which included:
- an above-ground inspection of the damaged quay on both sides,
- an order for an underwater inspection of the pier, to be performed by a certified diver,
- a visual inspection of the ship’s hull, in particular the bow bulb, conducted with the participation of a diver and a classification society inspector who inspected the ship from the inside (from the forepeak),
- an analysis of the documentation: data from the GPS device, the ship’s log, the engine room log, and written statements submitted by the captain and the chief engineer.
The impact on the infrastructure proved to be severe. The damage report noted spalling of the concrete quay slab and a series of other defects. For the seaport operator, this meant a renovation.
The Dispute Over the Point of Impact
In the course of the commission’s work, conflicts often arise between the ship’s captain and port authorities. In our example, the ship’s captain filed a formal protest. Although he admitted that he struck the quay due to a power outage, he disputed the location identified by the commission. The captain claimed that the ship struck the quay approximately 20 meters away. Conflicts often arise between the ship’s captain and port authorities during the commission’s investigation. In our example, the ship’s captain filed a formal protest. Although he admitted that he had struck the quay due to a propulsion failure, he disputed the location identified by the commission. On this basis, he categorically refused to provide a financial guarantee for the allegedly incorrectly located repair.
From a legal and evidentiary standpoint, in order to verify the captain’s claims, the port commission could have relied on an underwater inspection conducted by an independent team of divers.
Threat of vessel detention and request for a financial guarantee
The consequences of the captain’s refusal to acknowledge the damage were immediate. The Port Authority made a preliminary estimate of the infrastructure repair costs and demanded a financial guarantee from the shipowner. The shipowner’s refusal triggered an administrative procedure.
The Port Authority submitted a request to the Port Captain’s Office to detain the vessel. The Port Captain, exercising his authority, issued a decision to detain the vessel for a period of 72 hours (excluding statutory holidays). For any shipowner, the detention of a vessel is the worst-case scenario. It means downtime, the termination of charter agreements, demurrage costs, and reputational damage. The latter often far exceeds the cost of repairing the wharf itself.
It was only when faced with the real possibility of detention and after consulting with lawyers that the shipowner made a rational decision. To avoid further detention, he provided security as a precautionary measure. In such situations, it is common practice for the P&I club to acknowledge the claim. Ultimately, the Harbor Master issued a release note, and the ship was able to continue its voyage to its destination port.
The dispute continued during the claims settlement process. The shipowner, in cooperation with the port authorities, may have had access to the tender documentation and cost estimates for the repairs, and may also have been present during the acceptance of the construction work.
The Role of the LO:ME Law Firm – How Do We Assist in Maritime Matters?
Matters involving maritime and port law require more than just a thorough knowledge of the relevant regulations—both domestic laws and international conventions. Above all, they require a deep understanding of operational realities, how P&I insurance works, and maritime administrative procedures. LO:ME Law Firm provides comprehensive legal assistance at every stage. We are with you from the very first hours after an incident until the final resolution of any potential litigation.
How does the LO:ME Law Firm support shipowners, captains, agents, and port authorities during crises?
- Response Immediately Following an Accident (Emergency Response). We represent the interests of the vessel and the shipowner during inspections and port commission proceedings. We ensure that evidence is properly preserved (for example, we ensure the reliability of diving inspections and certifications).
- Protection of the captain and crew. Damage reports are often prepared in a local language that the captain does not understand. We advise captains during the process of filing maritime protests and statements to avoid unintentionally acknowledging a claim or liability due to a language barrier.
- Negotiations regarding the guarantee and the release of the vessel. When there is a risk of detention (seizure of the vessel) or judicial arrest, time is of the essence. We negotiate with port authorities, the Harbor Master’s Office, and P&I clubs. We do this to secure the best possible protection against claims and to ensure the vessel is released as quickly as possible to continue its voyage.
- Support in demolition and construction projects. When a port begins repairing damaged infrastructure, we ensure that the shipowner is not excluded from the decision-making process. On behalf of our client, we request access to tender documentation, construction plans, and cost estimates. We file formal objections to protect the shipowner from unjustified inflation of repair costs by port authorities.
- Recourse and Damages. In the case under review, the accident occurred as a result of a propulsion system failure. The LO:ME law firm analyzes such factual circumstances with a view to pursuing recourse claims (e.g., holding the shipyard liable for defects in the engine repair). This allows the shipowner to be compensated for the losses incurred in port.
Please feel free to contact us.
Summary
A ship’s grounding in port involves a complex interplay of technical issues, time pressure, and enormous sums of money. Proper crisis management in the first few hours after a ship collides with the quay is crucial. It determines the final costs the shipowner will incur and the speed at which the ship will return to service. Decisions made in haste, based on incomplete information, or without legal consultation (e.g., a refusal to post a bond resulting in the vessel’s detention) can have disastrous financial consequences.
That is why, in cases of this nature, it is essential to immediately engage experienced maritime law specialists. LO:ME Law Firm is here to assist you. We offer professional support that ensures the legal safety of shipping and the operations of ships and seaports. We focus on minimizing losses in every emergency situation at sea and in port, no matter how complex.
